Mcgahee Et Al. v. Mcgahee Book Reviews

Mcgahee Et Al. v. Mcgahee by Supreme Court of Georgia Book Summary

On April 16, 1974, plaintiff, Don Anthony Gomes (hereinafter referred to as appellant) filed a complaint in the Circuit Court alleging that on December 4, 1973, while he was incarcerated by the Honolulu Police Department, defendant, Steven Tyau (hereinafter referred to as appellee), a licensed physician, administered to appellant a penile wash to determine whether there was any specimen of spermatozoa. The complaint alleges that the penile wash was administered over the objection of appellant and "without a warrant of search and seizure and in professional misconduct and gross carelessness of the rights of [appellant], who was not the patient of [appellee]." The complaint characterizes appellee as "assaulting and battering" the appellant.

👋 Do you love Mcgahee Et Al. v. Mcgahee books? Please share your friends!

Mcgahee Et Al. v. Mcgahee (Supreme Court of Georgia) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of Georgia - Mcgahee Et Al. v. Mcgahee Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Mcgahee Et Al. v. Mcgahee by Supreme Court of Georgia book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Mcgahee Et Al. v. Mcgahee!