Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Floyd Henderson Book Reviews

Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Floyd Henderson by Supreme Court of North Carolina Book Summary

Plaintiff contends that the hearing commissioner committed error in admission of and exclusion of some of the testimony and exhibits offered. However, in plaintiffs brief there is citation of authority to support only one of these contentions. As to this one, plaintiff contends, and we agree, that it was technical error to permit the witness to read from the statement or report made by him, offered as defendants exhibit #2, without the witness testifying in substance that it refreshed his memory or that he still did not recollect the facts but recalled having written it correctly when the facts were fresh in his memory. Stansbury, N.C. Evidence 2d, § 23. However, we hold that this error was not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.

👋 Do you love Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Floyd Henderson books? Please share your friends!

Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Floyd Henderson (Supreme Court of North Carolina) Book Reviews 2024

Supreme Court of North Carolina - Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Floyd Henderson Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Floyd Henderson by Supreme Court of North Carolina book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Floyd Henderson!