Bridges v. City of Boynton Beach Book Reviews

Bridges v. City of Boynton Beach by District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida Fourth District January Term 2006 Book Summary

After this courts decision in the case of Lankford et al. v. Holton et al., decided January 13, 1943, 195 Ga. 317 (24 S.E.2d 292), and a rehearing having thereafter been denied, when the remittitur from the Supreme Court reached the clerk of the trial court the plaintiffs in error filed a petition in equity against the defendants in error. That petition sought to prevent the court from entering a judgment on the remittitur, which judgment gave direction to the trial court as to the kind of decree to be entered. Mrs. Mattie L. Lankford and the heirs of H. L. Lankford sought separate and distinct relief against the defendants. Mrs. Mattie L. Lankford claimed that the option contract and settlement agreement of October, 1923, should be reformed. Her prayers were that the agreement and option of 1923 should be reformed and declared void, and that title to the property contained in the 3.5 tracts should be decreed in Mrs. Mattie L. Lankford, and that Mrs. Holton should be enjoined from selling these lots. She further claimed, that Mrs. Holton had collected rents sufficient to satisfy the original indebtedness under the Lankford loan deed to Tanner, and damages for alleged trespass.

👋 Do you love Bridges v. City of Boynton Beach books? Please share your friends!

Bridges v. City of Boynton Beach (District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida Fourth District January Term 2006) Book Reviews 2024

District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida Fourth District January Term 2006 - Bridges v. City of Boynton Beach Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about Bridges v. City of Boynton Beach by District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida Fourth District January Term 2006 book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about Bridges v. City of Boynton Beach!