David Lawrence v. State Florida Book Reviews

David Lawrence v. State Florida by Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida Book Summary

Per Curiam. The appellant David Lawrence seeks reversal of two judgments of conviction of the crime of robbery. We have carefully considered the points presented on appeal in the light of the record and briefs, and have concluded that no reversible error is shown. Defendant's motions for mistrial made on voir dire and during trial were properly denied. The trial court instructed the jury to disregard the remarks of the prosecutor which were the basis for motions for mistrial. Morris v. State, 100 Fla. 850, 130 So. 582; Harris v. State, 75 Fla. 527, 78 So. 526. The testimony elicited from co-defendants regarding their having pleaded guilty was not met by timely objection. English v. State, 122 Fla. 77, 164 So. 848; McCullers v. State, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 909, 913. An improper comment of the prosecutor during the course of testimony of the witness Apfel is not considered prejudicial such as to call for reversal in that the effect thereof did not appear to be such that it would not have been cured by instructions to the jury to disregard such objectionable remarks, had request for such instruction been made. See Perry v. State, 146 Fla. 187, 200 So. 525; Morris v. State, supra.

👋 Do you love David Lawrence v. State Florida books? Please share your friends!

David Lawrence v. State Florida (Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida) Book Reviews 2024

Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida - David Lawrence v. State Florida Discussions & Comments

Have you read this book yet? What do you think about David Lawrence v. State Florida by Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida book? Ask the bookpedia.co community a question about David Lawrence v. State Florida!