Reseña de Gist v. State

Gist v. State de Supreme Court of the United States Resumen del Libro

The question to be resolved in this case is whether the bright line rule that the court has adopted in direct appeals from convictions premised on pleas of guilty in which the trial court failed to assiduously follow the requirements of Rule 15(c), W.R. Cr.P., should be extended to cases in which the issue is raised by a petition for post-conviction relief. The district court ruled that the appellant, Roger Maurice Gist, failed to establish any basis for post-conviction relief, and it denied relief, dismissing the petition that Gist presented pursuant to §§ 7-14-101 to -108, W.S. 1977. We agree that Gist is not entitled to relief under the statutory post-conviction procedure, and we affirm the ruling of the district court.

👋 ¿Te encanta el libro Gist v. State? ¿Podría compartir por favor?

Gist v. State (Supreme Court of the United States) Análisis y Personajes

Comentario de Gist v. State, libro de Supreme Court of the United States

¿Ya leíste este libro? ¿Qué opinas del libro Gist v. State de Supreme Court of the United States? ¡Haga una pregunta a la comunidad de bookpedia.co sobre Gist v. State!